Oral-B vs Philips: Which Secures Your Data Better?
Explore how US-based Oral-B and EU's Philips handle your personal care data, ensuring security and privacy. Make an informed choice today!
Should You Switch to Philips?
Gain better data privacy and sustainable product design.
Lose advanced oral care features and smart tracking.
Switch if privacy and sustainability are priorities; otherwise, stay with Oral-B.
At a Glance
US data laws
GDPR protected
Oral-B
Contact
Philips
paid
Migration info not available
Privacy & Compliance Comparison
Critical data sovereignty factors at a glance
| Criteria | Oral-B | Philips |
|---|---|---|
Server Location | Unknown | Unknown |
GDPR Compliance | Unknown | Unknown |
Open Source | ||
E2E Encryption | Unknown | Unknown |
Data Portability | Unknown | Unknown |
CLOUD Act Notice
Oral-B is a US company and must comply with CLOUD Act data requests, even for data stored in EU data centers. Philips is not subject to US jurisdiction.
Oral-B
๐บ๐ธOral-B
Philips
๐ช๐บPhilips
US Data Storage
Data subject to US CLOUD Act and may be accessed by US authorities
EU Data Protection
Data protected under GDPR with EU-only data residency
Certifications & Compliance
No certifications listed
No certifications listed
Reasons to Switch
- โPhilips offers energy-efficient LED lighting solutions for home use.
- โSmart health monitoring devices from Philips enhance overall wellness tracking.
- โPhilips has a strong commitment to sustainable product design initiatives.
- โUser-friendly mobile health apps from Philips support easy health management.
Things to Consider
- !Philips lacks specific dental features like pressure sensors for gum safety.
- !Switching requires adapting to a new app interface for health tracking.
- !Philips products may not support the same variety of brush head types.
Ready to make the switch?
Start using Philips today and take control of your data privacy.